http://www.menspsychology.com/blog/the-sexual-attraction-test

Let me know what you think!

That URL is broken. I am guessing this is the correct one?

http://www.menspsychology.com/blog/the- ... ction-test

yesyes I was trying my new tinyurl function and I guess it didn't work. Thanks for pointing to the right one!

2 out of 10....

And to be honest, some of those answers were only approximations of what I would have done in those situations. I wouldn't have been surprised to get even lower than that.

I was tempted to pick what I thought was the right answers just to see how clever I was, but the options were so tricky I ended up picking the true answers.

I got an honest 6/10, room for improvement.

I got a 2 out 10 too...what the hell lol. Looks like I got some work to do

3 out of 10.

When I picked what I thought might be the right answers, I got 2 out of 10 haha.

4 out of 10. Definite room for improvement. Chose the answers for the actions that I most often take. Great Q's and A's, really gets your OE on and makes you realise your options within interactions. Made me realise that I'm resting on my laurels in a way. Need to keep up the practice!

I got 2 out of 10 as well, and that's cuz I thought I was being clever

My first attempt was equally poor. Kinda thought I was better than that after all my work in the past and what's happening for me in real life at the moment.

It took some time, but I figured out all the correct answers by trial and error. I see the logic behind most of the answers now, when keeping Omega principles in mind, but I'm not sure I agree with the scoring system.

I think some of the "wrong" answers should give partial credit and the current methodology gives full credit for only the one correct answer out of four possibles on each question. Scores like 2 out of 10 are a bit harsh.

I think it should be more like the KWML test where it gives a score and then a nickname for your level. Maybe it would make it more fun. (However I apologize in advance for my lack of creativity for names/levels) but you get the idea. Maybe someone more creative than I can come up with some more entertaining names.

For example:

0-30% - AFC
30-50% - Aspiring PUA
50-70% - Alpha Male
70-90% - VIP Player Status
90-100% - Omega Male

A cool graphic / cartoon character with each level might also be fun.

Overall a good test though and got me thinking more about the Omega principles.

2 out of 10.

e, d and c.

It's designed to be very tricky indeed. To get around what appear to be obvious answers, and with a sensibility for women's psychology too - to get only the highest quality women, probably the highest intelligence women too frankly, being a man who is a "gentleman with an edge to him," and encouraging the woman to want you long term not just short term...